The Ten Statements
of Doing Without
-
To address persistent grief, there is a need to model the field of psychology as ‘one complete system’.
-
Currently, professional authors often only write about those diagnostic specialties in the field of psychology, for which they are an ‘expert’.
-
Some popular authors only use a “tools in the toolkit” approach which offers stand-alone ‘ad hoc’ ideas.
-
Many authors who write about psychology using the concept of a “system”, have no experience studying the models of complete, complex, physical systems.
-
For us to avoid reaching erroneous conclusions, the field of psychology should be seen as one complete system.
-
No system can correctly respond to changes (loss), unless there is a baseline of ‘normal’ as a reference. A model of a system that ignores some of the inputs to that system, can't build an accurate ‘normal’ baseline.
-
Our incomplete approach to psychology currently ignores one group of inputs to that system.
-
This group of inputs has been ignored, because an early history where “nothing happened”, is hard to model.
-
The early grief from child neglect is hard to model.
-
In the Doing Without series, we attempt to address this, so that grieving adults can reclaim the life path of truth, they never knew they lost.